MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778724961 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02575

Using Thermodynamics to Predict the Outcomes of Nitrate-Based Oil Reservoir Souring Control Interventions

2017· article· en· W2778724961 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Dolfing, Casey R. J. Hubert

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsNitrateChemistryEnvironmental chemistryGibbs free energyInorganic chemistryRedoxOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Souring is the undesirable production of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in oil reservoirs by sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Souring is a common problem during secondary oil recovery via water flooding, especially when seawater with its high sulphate concentration is introduced. Nitrate injection into these oil reservoirs can prevent and remediate souring by stimulating nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB). Two conceptually different mechanisms for NRB-facilitated souring control have been proposed: nitrate-sulphate competition for electron donors (oil-derived organics or H2) and nitrate driven sulphide oxidation. Thermodynamics can facilitate predictions about which nitrate-driven mechanism is most likely to occur in different scenarios. From a thermodynamic perspective the question “Which reaction yields more energy, nitrate driven oxidation of sulphide or nitrate driven oxidation of organic compounds?” can be rephrased as: “What is the equilibrium constant for the acetate driven sulphate reduction to sulphide?” or more precisely: “Is acetate driven sulphate reduction to sulphide exergonic or endergonic?” Our analysis indicates that under conditions encountered in oil fields, sulphate driven oxidation of acetate (or other SRB organic electron donors) is always more favourable than sulphide oxidation to sulphate: the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔGo') for the reaction CH3COO- + SO42- + 2H+ " 2CO2 + HS- + 2H2O is -57.3 kJ, i.e., the equilibrium for this reaction is strongly to the right. That predicts that organotrophic NRB that oxidize acetate would outcompete lithotrophic NRB that oxidize sulphide. However, sulphide oxidation to elemental sulphur is different; ΔGo' for the reaction CH3COO- + 4S0 + 2H2O " 2CO2 + 4HS- + 3H+ is -16.3 kJ under standard conditions at pH 7. Low acetate levels drive this reaction to the left, i.e., make HS- oxidation more favourable than acetate oxidation. Incomplete oxidation of sulphide to S0 is likely to occur when nitrate levels are low, and is favoured by low temperatures; conditions that can be encountered at oil field above-ground facilities where intermediate sulphur compounds like S0 may cause corrosion. These findings have implications for reservoir management strategies and for assessing the success and progress of nitrate-based souring control strategies and the attendant risks of corrosion associated with souring and nitrate injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207