MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778845873 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04061

Inverse Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Cinnamate Modified Cellulose Nanocrystals as Templates To Prepare Silica Colloidosomes

2017· article· en· W2778845873 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhen Zhang, Kam Chiu Tam, Xiaosong Wang, Gilles Sèbe

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsPickering emulsionMaterials scienceChemical engineeringWettingTolueneRhodamine BCellulosePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryNanoparticleNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialPhotocatalysisCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A facile method to prepare colloidosomes at room temperature from inverse water-in-oil (w/o) Pickering emulsions containing silica precursors and stabilized by cinnamate modified cellulose nanocrystals (Cin-CNC) is proposed. Cin-CNC Pickering emulsifiers were prepared by acylation with an excess of cinnamoyl chloride. The Cin-CNC surface displayed partial wettability with both toluene and water, which allowed the stabilization of w/o inverse Pickering emulsions. The Cin-CNC particles around the droplets were subsequently locked by cross-linking TEOS or TBOS silica precursors at the water/toluene interface, leading to an intricate network of polysiloxane within the Cin-CNC shell. In optimized conditions, the Cin-CNC/silica colloidosomes obtained displayed a robust and compact shell, which ensured a long-term encapsulation of rhodamine B or biological molecules such as fluorescent deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207