MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778861432 · doi:10.51657/ric.v4i2.41015

Défis de traduction et d’analyse

2017· article· fr· W2778861432 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sylvie Barma, Marie-Caroline Vincent, Samantha Voyer

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette section vise le partage d'expériences de traduction et d'analyse auxquelles des équipes de recherche font face.À notre connaissance, peu de ressources sont publiées pour venir en aide et guider les chercheurs et leurs étudiants gradués francophones quand ils plongent dans l'analyse qualitative en théorie de l'activité ou dans d'autres approches historico-socioculturelles.Nous proposons ici des outils méthodologiques pour les aider.Cette section présente des traductions libres d'articles déjà publiés et révisés par les pairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.061
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0610.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0090.068
Scholarly communication0.0290.021
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de VygotskySame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207