The origin of dopaminergic systems in chordate brains: insights from amphioxus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The basic anatomy of the central nervous system (CNS) is well conserved within the vertebrates and differs in significant ways from that of non-vertebrate chordates. Of the latter, amphioxus is of special interest, being the best available stand-in for the basal chordate condition. Immunohistochemical and gene expression studies on the developing CNS of amphioxus embryos and larvae are now sufficiently advanced that we can begin to assign specific neurotransmitter phenotypes to neurons identified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and then compare the distribution of cell types to that in vertebrate brains. Here, by monitoring tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) transcripts and protein, along with serial TEM, we identify a population of catecholamine-containing neurons in the anterior nerve cord of amphioxus larvae and describe their pattern of synaptic inputs and outputs. Inputs parallel those to the large paired neurons that control the larval escape response, suggesting that the TH+ system functions as an accessory excitatory and perhaps modulatory pathway in larval locomotion, with the added feature of recruiting an assortment of additional interneurons to the circuitry. The TH+ cells probably contain either L-DOPA or dopamine, and correspond closely with a cell population known from previous work on adult amphioxus to be dopaminergic. This population lies in a CNS domain now thought to comprise a combined vertebrate diencephalon plus mesencephalon, the implication being that dopaminergic nuclei in both of these brain regions could derive from a single dien-mesencephalic population in the last common ancestor of amphioxus and vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".