Cardiolipin synthase A colocalizes with cardiolipin and osmosensing transporter ProP at the poles of <i>Escherichia coli</i> cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osmosensing by transporter ProP is modulated by its cardiolipin (CL)-dependent concentration at the poles of Escherichia coli cells. Other contributors to this phenomenon were sought with the BACterial Two-Hybrid System (BACTH). The BACTH-tagged variants T18-ProP and T25-ProP retained ProP function and localization. Their interaction confirmed the ProP homo-dimerization previously established by protein crosslinking. YdhP, YjbJ and ClsA were prominent among the putative ProP interactors identified by the BACTH system. The functions of YdhP and YjbJ are unknown, although YjbJ is an abundant, osmotically induced, soluble protein. ClsA (CL Synthase A) had been shown to determine ProP localization by mediating CL synthesis. Unlike a deletion of clsA, deletion of ydhP or yjbJ had no effect on ProP localization or function. All three proteins were concentrated at the cell poles, but only ClsA localization was CL-dependent. ClsA was shown to be N-terminally processed and membrane-anchored, with dual, cytoplasmic, catalytic domains. Active site amino acid replacements (H224A plus H404A) inactivated ClsA and compromised ProP localization. YdhP and YjbJ may be ClsA effectors, and interactions of YdhP, YjbJ and ClsA with ProP may reflect their colocalization at the cell poles. Targeted CL synthesis may contribute to the polar localization of CL, ClsA and ProP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".