MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779459217 · doi:10.1093/chromsci/bmx109

Determination of Dicyclohexylamine in Beeswax by Aqueous Normal Phase Liquid Chromatography Coupled With Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2017· article· en· W2779459217 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Thomas S. Thompson, Johan P. van den Heever, Stephen F. Pernal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatographic Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaDalhousie UniversityOregon State University
KeywordsBeeswaxChromatographyChemistryMass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometryBeekeepingExtraction (chemistry)Solid phase extractionApiaryDetection limitBeehiveElectrospray ionizationWaxOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dicyclohexylamine (DCH) is an excipient present in commercial formulations of fumagillin (Fumagilin-B® and Fumidil-B®), an antibiotic which is employed in apiculture for the control of nosema disease. DCH has been demonstrated to be stable in harvested honey; however, its fate in the beehive has not been investigated. In this study, DCH residues were determined in beeswax samples collected from brood chambers and honey supers from various apiaries throughout Alberta. The determination of DCH was performed using a simple extraction procedure followed by low-temperature cleanup and finally analysis with aqueous normal phase liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. The method was found to yield high accuracy and precision (94.9 ± 1.7% to 110.8 ± 6.6%) for replicate beeswax samples spiked with 4, 80, 360 and 2,000 μg kg-1 of DCH. With a limit of quantification of 1 μg kg-1, 100% of the 61 beeswax samples analyzed were found to contain residues of DCH ranging from 15 to 6,410 μg kg-1. The results indicate that DCH can accumulate in beeswax when Fumagilin-B® or Fumidil-B® is applied in apiculture and that these concentrations can vary significantly among beekeeping operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chromatographic ScienceSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207