Bibliometrías de las Luchas Urbanas por la Vivienda: Delineando las Geografías Críticas del Conocimiento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los sistemas de analisis bibliometrico reportan una cantidad de insumos para evaluar los lineamientos teoricos y principales autorias que sustentan un programa de investigacion, o la produccion cientifica de algunas revistas. Sin embargo, poner el acento en perspectivas criticas permite develar las configuraciones hegemonicas en las geopoliticas del conocimiento y sus influencias en contextos y espacios tanto del sur como del norte global. El presente trabajo aborda un estudio bibliometrico con miras a determinar las matrices epistemicas, programas de investigacion, lineas teoricas y autores existentes en torno a las luchas urbanas por la vivienda en la geografia y los estudios urbanos. Se aplicaron metodos bibliometricos, integrando herramientas de analisis y visualizacion (HistCite y VOSviewer) a los insumos entregados por la base de datos Web of Science (WoS). Se aprecia la hegemonia del norte global en la visibilidad de los estudios detectados, asi como tambien la predominante influencia teorica a partir de la formacion de centros de produccion cientifica y programas de investigacion con altos grados de consolidacion en el ambito de las luchas urbanas por la vivienda. Se concluye con la necesidad de establecer posturas criticas desde el sur global con respecto a la matriz epistemica generada desde el hemisferio norte. The systems of bibliometric analysis report a considerable amount of inputs to evaluate the theoretical guidelines and main authorships that underpin a research program, or the scientific production of some magazines. However, placing the emphasis on critical perspectives allows us to unveil hegemonic configurations in the geopolitics of knowledge and its influences in contexts and spaces both in the south and in the global north. The present work deals with a bibliometric study in order to determine the epistemic matrices, research programs, theoretical lines and authors existing around urban struggles for housing in geography and urban studies. Bibliometric methods were applied, integrating analysis and visualization tools (HistCite and VOSviewer) to the inputs delivered by the Web of Science (WoS) database. The hegemony of the global north is seen in the visibility of the studies detected, as well as the predominant theoretical influence from the formation of centers of scientific production and research programs with high degrees of consolidation in the field of urban struggles for living place. It concludes with the need to establish critical positions from the global south with respect to the epistemic matrix generated from the northern hemisphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.027 | 0.065 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".