MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779515182 · doi:10.5114/kitp.2017.72227

Open lung biopsy performed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a safe procedure

2017· article· en· W2779515182 on OpenAlex
Tomasz Marjański, Joanna Halman, Sonia Taniewska, Natalia Burzyńska, Anna M. Piekarska, Wioletta Sawicka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMedicineCardiothoracic surgeryLungBiopsyLung biopsyPulmonary fibrosisIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisSurgeryRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an interstitial lung disease with a fatal prognosis. The diagnosis is made on the basis of high-resolution computed tomography and histological examination in selected cases. Aim: To determine the risk of complications of open lung biopsy performed in patients with IPF. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients who underwent diagnostic excision of pulmonary parenchyma due to IPF in the period 1995-2014. We assessed the complication rate, length of drainage, postoperative period and 30-day mortality. We compared the results of treatment in the groups of patients operated on with thoracotomy and videothoracoscopy. Results: The mean age of patients was 58 (47% female, 53% male) forced vital capacity (FVC) was 81%, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) was 80% and body mass index (BMI) was 27 kg/m 2 . Thoracotomies (lateral, muscle sparing or anterior) were performed in 20 patients between 1995 and 2012 and videothoracoscopy in 31 patients operated on in the years 2009-2014. Patients in study groups did not differ considering age (p = 0.40), gender (p = 0.81), FVC (p = 0.08), FEV 1 (p = 0.13) or BMI (p = 0.75). Postoperative complications occurred in 3.9% of patients (atrial arrhythmia 1.9% and recurrent pneumothorax 1.9%) with equal incidence in both study groups (p = 0.75). Median stay after thoracotomy was 4 days while after videothoracoscopy it was 3 days (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Open lung biopsy performed on patients with IPF is a safe procedure. Open lung biopsy performed through thoracotomy could be as safe as through VATS, however is characterized by longer postoperative stay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it