The Protestant Factor of Development of the Lower Volga and the Don: in the Writings of Historians of the Volgograd State University
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes the theses presented by the historians of the Volgograd State University and devoted to studying the influence of the Protestant factor on the socio-economic, political and cultural development of the Lower Volga region and the Don region.The authors point to a high contribution of the researchers to the study of such aspects as socio-economic and cultural development of the Protestant communities, the emigration of Germans and Mennonites to America and Canada, the features of cooperative construction and the implementation of agrarian reform of P.A. Stolypin in the colonies, the assistance by foreign Mennonite organizations during the famine and NEP, as well as the specifics of development of Russian Protestantism in the Volga region.T.P. Nazarova determines the contribution of the VolSU researchers to the study of pre-revolutionary stage of Protestantism development in Russia.V.V. Tarakanov analyzes the works that characterize the activities of Protestant cooperation.O.Yu.Redkina discloses the problem of state-confessional relations in the USSR in dissertational studies of the VolSU historians, substantiates the further directions of research in the historiography of Protestantism in Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".