MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2779628274

L'engagement du père Georges-Henri Lévesque dans la modernité canadienne-française, 1932-1962 : contribution à l'histoire intellectuelle du catholicisme et de la modernité au Canada français

2015· article· fr· W2779628274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jules Racine St-Jacques

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceModernityEthnologyArtSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre 1932 et 1962, l'engagement du pere Georges-Henri Levesque, o.p., dans la modernite canadienne-francaise se decline sur quatre plans principaux: modernite economique, modernite sociale, modernite epistemologique et modernite culturelle. A chacun de ces plans correspond un episode plus ou moins conflictuel de la carriere intellectuelle du pere Levesque. Dans cette these, nous analysons ces episodes en les inscrivant dans la tension generale entre l'Eglise et la societe moderne depuis la Revolution francaise. Face aux changements qui affectent le Canada francais a compter de la Crise des annees 1930, l'engagement du dominicain consiste surtout en un effort de resolution des contradictions apparentes de la modernite. Dans la crise economique des annees 1930, Levesque se fait promoteur de la cooperation pour conjuguer les interets individuels au bien de la collectivite. Sur le plan social, anticipant le divorce de l'Eglise et de la societe canadienne-francaise, il defend la non-confessionnalite des cooperatives comme un moyen de les reconcilier. Doyen de la Faculte des sciences sociales de l'Universite Laval a partir de 1938, il s'efforce de distinguer la science sociale de la doctrine sociale catholique pour mieux les unir en vue d'une action proprement catholique sur la societe canadienne-francaise. Membre de la Commission royale d'enquete sur l'avancement des arts, des lettres et des sciences au Canada au tournant des annees 1950, le pere Levesque distingue entre nationalisme et patriotisme pour mieux repenser la reference nationale canadienne-francaise en fonction des imperatifs de la modernite culturelle. A travers l'analyse de ces moments marquants, nous tentons non seulement de mieux comprendre l'evolution de la pensee de Georges-Henri Levesque, mais aussi de mettre au jour les strategies qu'il deploie pour faire valoir ses idees dans l'entrelacs epineux des champs clerical, universitaire et politique dans lequel il se trouve engage. Au fil de ce recit se revele une sensibilite religieuse resolument optimiste, tournee vers l'avenir et valorisant l'engagement de tous les croyants hic et nunc en fonction d'une analyse rationnelle du monde contemporain.%%%%Between 1932 and 1962, Father Georges-Henri Levesque’s, O.P., implication in French Canadian modern society was based on four main fronts: economic, social, epistemological and cultural modernity. Each of these fronts corresponds to a more or less conflictual period in Father Levesque’s intellectual career. These periods will be analysed by interpreting them in the context of the general tensions between the Church and modern society since the French Revolution. Faced with the changes that affected French Canada since the Great Depression, Father Levesque’s efforts consisted mainly in resolving the apparent contradictions of the modern era. During the economic crisis of the 1930s, Levesque promoted the co-operative movement as a way of reconciling individual interests for the greater good of the community. On the social front, anticipating the separation of…

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.017
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→