A modified method for estimating permeability of clayey soils based on piezocone sounding results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modified method for estimating permeability of clayey deposits in the horizontal direction (kh) based on piezocone sounding (uCPT) results is proposed. Most of the currently available methods relate the value of kh with the Δu/[Formula: see text] ratio (Δu is the measured excess pore pressure from uCPT at the shoulder of the cone and [Formula: see text] is the initial vertical effective stress at the measurement location). However, it has been understood that the effect of the overconsolidation ratio (OCR) on the Δu/[Formula: see text] ratio is more significant than that on the value of kh. As a result, for an overconsolidated deposit, there is no suitable method for estimating the value of kh based on uCPT results. Based on the results of laboratory model uCPT, an empirical equation for considering the effect of the OCR on Δu/[Formula: see text] and then kh corresponding to the yield vertical effective stress ([Formula: see text]) and initial vertical effective stress ([Formula: see text]) for OCR > 1.0 is established. The modified method for kh corresponding to [Formula: see text] requires two parameters: OCR and a model parameter (α). In addition, for kh corresponding to [Formula: see text], two more soil parameters are needed: the swelling index (Cs) and the initial void ratio (e0). The methods for estimating these parameters are also proposed. Finally, the modified method is applied to three field case histories to show its usefulness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".