MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779963304 · doi:10.1007/s11357-017-0002-y

The Oxygen Paradox, the French Paradox, and age-related diseases

2017· review· en· W2779963304 on OpenAlexaff
Joanna M. Davies, Josiane Cillard, Bertrand Friguet, Enrique Cadenas, Jean Cadet, Rachael Cayce, Andrew J. Fishmann, David Liao, Anne‐Laure Bulteau, Frederic Derbré, Amélie Rébillard, Steven Burstein, Étienne C. Hirsch, Robert A. Kloner, Michael W. Jakowec, Giselle M. Petzinger, Delphine Sauce, Florian Sennlaub, Isabelle Limon, Fulvio Ursini, Matilde Maiorino, Christina Economides, Christian J. Pike, Pinchas Cohen, Anne Nègre‐Salvayre, Matthew R. Halliday, Adam J. Lundquist, Nicolaus A. Jakowec, Fatima Mechta‐Grigoriou, Mathias Mericskay, Jean Mariani, Zhenlin Li, David Huang, Ellsworth Grant, Henry Jay Forman, Caleb E. Finch, Patrick Y. Sun, Laura C.D. Pomatto, Onnik Agbulut, David Warburton, Christian Néri, Mustapha Rouis, Pierre Cillard, Jacqueline Capeau, Jean Rosenbaum, Kelvin J.A. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueGeroScience · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueConseil Régional de BretagneFondation de FranceAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisLigue Contre le CancerUniversité Toulouse III - Paul SabatierUniversity of Southern CaliforniaAgence Nationale de la RechercheParkinsonfondenRégion BretagneOffice for Science and Technology of the Embassy of France in the United StatesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Parkinson FoundationInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleChildren's Hospital Los AngelesNational Science FoundationAmerican Foundation for Aging ResearchU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A paradox is a seemingly absurd or impossible concept, proposition, or theory that is often difficult to understand or explain, sometimes apparently self-contradictory, and yet ultimately correct or true. How is it possible, for example, that oxygen "a toxic environmental poison" could be also indispensable for life (Beckman and Ames Physiol Rev 78(2):547-81, 1998; Stadtman and Berlett Chem Res Toxicol 10(5):485-94, 1997)?: the so-called Oxygen Paradox (Davies and Ursini 1995; Davies Biochem Soc Symp 61:1-31, 1995). How can French people apparently disregard the rule that high dietary intakes of cholesterol and saturated fats (e.g., cheese and paté) will result in an early death from cardiovascular diseases (Renaud and de Lorgeril Lancet 339(8808):1523-6, 1992; Catalgol et al. Front Pharmacol 3:141, 2012; Eisenberg et al. Nat Med 22(12):1428-1438, 2016)?: the so-called, French Paradox. Doubtless, the truth is not a duality and epistemological bias probably generates apparently self-contradictory conclusions. Perhaps nowhere in biology are there so many apparently contradictory views, and even experimental results, affecting human physiology and pathology as in the fields of free radicals and oxidative stress, antioxidants, foods and drinks, and dietary recommendations; this is particularly true when issues such as disease-susceptibility or avoidance, "healthspan," "lifespan," and ageing are involved. Consider, for example, the apparently paradoxical observation that treatment with low doses of a substance that is toxic at high concentrations may actually induce transient adaptations that protect against a subsequent exposure to the same (or similar) toxin. This particular paradox is now mechanistically explained as "Adaptive Homeostasis" (Davies Mol Asp Med 49:1-7, 2016; Pomatto et al. 2017a; Lomeli et al. Clin Sci (Lond) 131(21):2573-2599, 2017; Pomatto and Davies 2017); the non-damaging process by which an apparent toxicant can activate biological signal transduction pathways to increase expression of protective genes, by mechanisms that are completely different from those by which the same agent induces toxicity at high concentrations. In this review, we explore the influences and effects of paradoxes such as the Oxygen Paradox and the French Paradox on the etiology, progression, and outcomes of many of the major human age-related diseases, as well as the basic biological phenomenon of ageing itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeroScienceSame topicAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyFrench-language works237,207