MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PCD Diagnosis by Super resolution (3DSIM) microscopy

2017· article· en· W2780050863 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Dell, Zhen Liu, Quynh Nguyen, Vito Mennella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaMicroscopyMedicineVideo microscopyPathologyGenetic testingFluorescence microscopeBiologyGeneticsCell biologyLungOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a heterogeneous recessive genetic disease characterized by impaired mucociliary clearance. PCD is currently diagnosed by analysis of transmission electron microscopy micrographs or genome sequencing of biallelic pathogenic variants in one of 37 known PCD genes. Despite recent advances in the genetics of PCD, there are suspected PCD cases that remain unresolved. Methods: We used immunofluorescence microscopy together with 3DSIM super-resolution microscopy (SRM) on airway epithelial cells freshly isolated from nostril of patients or airway cells grown on air liquid interphase to confirm or refute cases of PCD where transmission electron microscopy was non-diagnostic or where variants of unknown significance were identified in known PCD genes by genetic testing. In all cases, the laboratory technician developing and analyzing the images was blind to the TEM and genetic results of the patient. Results: To date, 7 patients with possible or confirmed PCD have been recruited and imaged by super-resolution microscopy. In all cases, SRM was helpful in either confirming or refuting the diagnosis of PCD. This includes cases with DNAH11, CCDC39, CCDC40, DNAH5, RPGR and CCNO variants. Conclusions: SRM can be a useful diagnostic tool to either confirm or refute the diagnosis of PCD in cases that cannot be solved with either transmission electron microscopy or current clinical genetic testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances→French-language works237,207→