MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780168803 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2017-317319

A new splice-site mutation in <i>SLC12A6</i> causing Andermann syndrome with motor neuronopathy

2017· letter· en· W2780168803 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nihan Hande Akçakaya, Zühal Yapıcı, Ceren Tunca, Pınar Tektürk, Fulya Akçimen, A. Nazlı Başak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSplice site mutationGeneticsMutationspliceRNA splicingMedicineBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solute carrier family 12 member 6 ( SLC12A6 ) mutations have been found to be responsible for the phenotype that causes agenesis of the corpus callosum (CC) with peripheral neuropathy, a condition which is also known as Andermann syndrome (AS). AS is an autosomal-recessive disease with syndromic features that has rarely been reported anywhere in the world other than Quebec, Canada.1 Hereditary neuropathies (HN) and complicated hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) call for differential diagnosis, since AS has both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative aspects affecting both sensory and motor fibres.1 2 This study presents an AS family who has motor neuropathy without sensory involvement due to a new SLC12A6 mutation. Patient 1 is a 17-year-old man of a first degree cousin marriage. He had hypotonia at birth. At the age of 2 years, he could walk independently, but after 3, he had difficulty in walking, which worsened in years to follow. He suffered from mild mental retardation, had phenotypic long face, hypoplastic maxilla, minimal bilateral ptosis (figure 1) and high-arched palate. Long tapered fingers were remarkable (figure 1). He had thoracic scoliosis and flexion contracture in both ankles. Symmetrical reduced muscle strength and atrophy existed in the proximal and distal muscles, which were more prominent in the lower extremities. Plantar reflex was noted to be extensor, and deep tendon reflexes could be detected. Electromyography (EMG) examination showed that sensory transmissions were normal, but …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207