Review of the Proterozoic evolution of the Grenville Province, its Adirondack outlier, and the Mesoproterozoic inliers of the Appalachians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, a rapidly expanding database, especially in sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) geochronology, has led to signifi cant advances in understanding of the Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Grenville Province, including its Adirondack outlier, and the Mesoproterozoic inliers of the Appalachians. Based upon this information, we review the geochronology and tectonic evolution of these regions and signifi cant similarities and differences between them. Isotopic data, including Pb isotopic mapping, suggest that a complex belt of marginal arcs and orogens existed from Labrador through the Adirondacks, the midcontinent, and into the southwest during the interval ca. 1.8‐1.3 Ga. Other data indicate that Mesoproterozoic inliers of the Appalachians, extending from Vermont to at least as far south as the New Jersey Highlands, are, in part, similar in composition and age to rocks in the southwestern Grenville Province. Mesoproterozoic inliers of the Appalachian Blue Ridge likewise contain some lithologies similar to northern terranes but exhibit Nd and Pb isotopic characteristics suggesting nonLaurentian, and perhaps Amazonian, affi nities. Models invoking an oblique collision of eastern Laurentia with Amazonia are consistent with paleomagnetic results, and collision is inferred to have begun at ca. 1.2 Ga. The collision resulted in both the ca. 1190‐1140 Ma Shawinigan orogeny and the ca. 1090‐980 Ma Grenvillian orogeny, which are well represented in the Appalachians. Several investigators have proposed that some Amazonian Mesoproterozoic crust may have been tectonically transferred to Laurentia at ca. 1.2 Ga. Data that potentially support or contradict this model are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".