MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Women’s subjectivity in the mirror of non-classical stage dance of 20th and 21st centuries

2017· article· en· W2780793567 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalia Kuriyumova, Galina Brandt

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik of Saint Petersburg University Philosophy and Conflict Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral Asia Education and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceSubjectivityStage (stratigraphy)AestheticsVisual artsHistoryArtPhilosophyEpistemologyGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers how the concept of woman’s subjectivity brought into focus in feminist critics
\nof the 20th century was evoked in non-classical dance of the 20th and 21st centuries. The authors’
\ngoal is to prove that artistic experiences of modern dance, followed by contemporary dance, became
\nthe productive form of woman’s writing, the most fruitful “location” where woman’s subjectivity
\nwas manifested, from the feminist theorists’ point of view. The authors saw their principal task as
\nexamining the history of the interest that outstanding choreographers of the 20th century developed
\nin seeking woman’s subjectivity “buried” in the body. The methodological frameworks integrated
\nhistorical and typological, philosophical, culturological, deconstructive, and gender analyses. The
\narticle distinguishes several major trends, they are: the Delsarte’s American studies of expressive
\nbody acting of the suffragist epoch (Loïe Fuller, Isadora Duncan, Mod Allan), German expressionist
\ndance, American modern dance and the Russian rhythmic and plastic dance of the first half of the
\n20th century (Marie Wiegmann, Martha Graham); the European Dance Theatre movement of the
\n1970s, that was the period of the second wave of feminism (Pina Bausch). It is stated that at the
\nclose of the 20th century and the early 21st century the brightest examples of the discussed theme are
\nthe artistic works deconstructing the concept of “woman’s subjectivity”. The analysis of the world
\nfamous performance “Co(te)lette” made by Anna van den Broek, a Dutch choreographer, presents a
\nclear illustration of this observation. Then, using the example of creative works by Marie Chouinard
\n(Canada), Mats Ek (Sweden), Matthew Bourne (Great Britain), the authors show how the plastic
\ndiscourse of contemporary dance is gradually transferred from the area of feminist rhetoric to the
\nfield studying various gender perversions. In conclusion, as the authors stance, the example of Ivo
\nDimchev performances demonstrates that in contemporary dance the theme of woman’s subjectivity
\nblurs and the attention focuses on the man with “strange’ (queer) gender identity, with floating
\nunstable uncertain feeling of belonging to being. Refs 19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik of Saint Petersburg University Philosophy and Conflict StudiesSame topicCentral Asia Education and CultureFrench-language works237,207