MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780945703 · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.011

Performance of the BacT/Alert Virtuo Microbial Detection System for the culture of sterile body fluids: prospective multicentre study

2017· article· en· W2780945703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Microbiology and Infection · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care
FundersBioFire Diagnostics
KeywordsGram stainingBlood cultureMedicineBody fluidMicrobiologyIncubationMicrobiological cultureBottleProspective cohort studySurgeryBacteriaBiologyInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Continuous monitoring blood culture systems are commonly used for sterile body fluid cultures. In this multicentre study, we evaluated the performance of the new-generation BacT/Alert Virtuo system compared to the BacT/Alert 3D and conventional culture for the recovery of microorganisms from sterile body fluids. METHODS: Peritoneal, cerebrospinal, pericardial, pleural and synovial fluids from adult patients submitted for culture were collected from three different centres. Specimens were inoculated into two bottles of the same bottle type (SA, SN, FA Plus or FN Plus) in equal volumes for simultaneous incubation in the Virtuo and 3D instruments. Each specimen was also Gram stained and seeded to solid media. RESULTS: A total of 811 specimens were inoculated to 1257 bottle pairs. The Virtuo and 3D showed equivalent recovery of clinically significant microorganisms (127/155, 81.9%, vs. 126/155, 81.3%, respectively). Solid media cultures recovered fewer pathogens than either continuous monitoring system (95/155, 61.3%, p <0.001), including significantly fewer Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci. The Virtuo was significantly faster than the 3D in median time to detection of isolates from the same specimen (12.5 (range, 2.8-101.5) hours vs. 15.5 (range, 4.3-78.5) hours, p <0.001). Direct specimen Gram stain detected the eventual pathogen in 30 (26.1%) of 115 significant positive specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The BacT/Alert Virtuo system was equivalent to the 3D system in organism recovery from sterile body fluid culture but showed faster detection of growth as a result of design enhancements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it