Mechanism of Urea Crystal Dissolution in Water from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are used to determine the mechanism of urea crystal dissolution in water under sink conditions. Crystals of cubic and tablet shapes are considered, and results are reported for four commonly used water models. The dissolution rates for different water models can differ considerably, but the overall dissolution mechanism remains the same. Urea dissolution occurs in three stages: a relatively fast initial stage, a slower intermediate stage, and a final stage. We show that the long intermediate stage is well described by classical rate laws, which assume that the dissolution rate is proportional to the active surface area. By carrying out simulations at different temperatures, we show that urea dissolution is an activated process, with an activation energy of ∼32 kJ mol –1 . Our simulations give no indication of a significant diffusion layer, and we conclude that the detachment of molecules from the crystal is the rate-determining step for dissolution. The results we report for urea are consistent with earlier observations for the dissolution of NaCl crystals. This suggests that the three-stage mechanism and classical rate laws might apply to the dissolution of other ionic and molecular crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".