Los pilares de la pedagogía deportiva de Coubertin : el influjo del mundo anglosajón
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coubertin recibio tres influencias cruciales que dieron forma a su pedagogia renovada: la Caballeria medieval, el mundo olimpico griego y el mundo anglosajon. Esos tres pilares sustentan el pensamiento y la obra pedagogico-deportiva de Coubertin. El objetivo de la Tesis Doctoral es estudiar el influjo del mundo anglosajon en la obra de Coubertin. Ademas, se analizara la faceta de pedagogo de Coubertin y, tambien, la de dirigente y organizador, hasta 1894. La metodologia es historica y se fundamenta en fuentes primarias y fuentes secundarias. La influencia del mundo anglosajon en la obra de Coubertin fue preponderante, la que prevalecio y tuvo mayor importancia. Las lecturas por parte de Coubertin de Tom Brown’s School Days (a los doce anos) y de Notes sur l’Angleterre (a los diecisiete anos); sus viajes a Inglaterra, en especial el primero en 1883, a los veinte anos, visitando Rugby (cuyo director habia sido Thomas Arnold) y otros centros educativos; y el viaje a EEUU y Canada en 1889, a los veintiseis anos, forman parte de los cimientos sobre los que se construye el pensamiento, la obra y el proyecto pedagogico de Coubertin, que hacen del deporte el instrumento capital de su politica de reforma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".