MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781492191

A self-organizing neural network with balanced excitatory and inhibitory input

2006· article· en· W2781492191 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Tang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisDimensionality reductionArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Hebbian theoryUnsupervised learningPrincipal component analysisInitializationMachine learningData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text clustering is a challenging problem due to the size of the data sets and the high dimensionality associated with natural language. This thesis makes contributions towards the determination of cluster structure using self-organizing neural network models, and the study of dimensionality reduction in text corpora. A new model of Self-Organization by Lateral Inhibition (SOLI) is proposed, which combines many of the good features of previous models while overcoming some of the drawbacks. Experiments on this new model indicate that SOLI is well suited for unsupervised learning tasks, such as clustering, has the potential to preserve topology and can be used for novelty detection. It is computationally efficient with O(n) time complexity and is not sensitive to the initial network parameters. A second self-organizing neural network model, the Self-Organization by Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Input model (SOBEII) is presented. Using balanced excitation and inhibition and an anti-Hebbian learning strategy, SOBEII is capable of automatically determining the proper cluster structure of given datasets in a robust manner. This is demonstrated using both synthetic and real datasets. SOBEII results match those of Expectation-Maximization. However, SOBEII is not sensitive to adverse initialization conditions or outliers in contrast to many conventional clustering methods. Before the above clustering methods can be applied to text clustering, dimensionality must be substantially reduced. A systematic study is conducted of several Dimension Reduction Techniques (DRT) using three standard benchmark datasets. The methods considered include three feature transformation techniques, Independent Component Analysis (ICA), Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), Random Projection (RP) and three feature selection techniques based on Document Frequency (DF), mean TfIdf (TI), and Term Frequency Variance (TfV). Experiments with the k-means clustering algorithm show that ICA and LSI are clearly superior to RP on all three datasets. Furthermore, it is shown that TI and TfV outperform DF for text clustering. Finally, experiments where a selection technique is followed by a transformation technique show that the combination can help substantially reduce the computational cost associated with the best transformation methods (ICA and LSI) while preserving clustering performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207