A self-organizing neural network with balanced excitatory and inhibitory input
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Text clustering is a challenging problem due to the size of the data sets and the high dimensionality associated with natural language. This thesis makes contributions towards the determination of cluster structure using self-organizing neural network models, and the study of dimensionality reduction in text corpora. A new model of Self-Organization by Lateral Inhibition (SOLI) is proposed, which combines many of the good features of previous models while overcoming some of the drawbacks. Experiments on this new model indicate that SOLI is well suited for unsupervised learning tasks, such as clustering, has the potential to preserve topology and can be used for novelty detection. It is computationally efficient with O(n) time complexity and is not sensitive to the initial network parameters. A second self-organizing neural network model, the Self-Organization by Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Input model (SOBEII) is presented. Using balanced excitation and inhibition and an anti-Hebbian learning strategy, SOBEII is capable of automatically determining the proper cluster structure of given datasets in a robust manner. This is demonstrated using both synthetic and real datasets. SOBEII results match those of Expectation-Maximization. However, SOBEII is not sensitive to adverse initialization conditions or outliers in contrast to many conventional clustering methods. Before the above clustering methods can be applied to text clustering, dimensionality must be substantially reduced. A systematic study is conducted of several Dimension Reduction Techniques (DRT) using three standard benchmark datasets. The methods considered include three feature transformation techniques, Independent Component Analysis (ICA), Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), Random Projection (RP) and three feature selection techniques based on Document Frequency (DF), mean TfIdf (TI), and Term Frequency Variance (TfV). Experiments with the k-means clustering algorithm show that ICA and LSI are clearly superior to RP on all three datasets. Furthermore, it is shown that TI and TfV outperform DF for text clustering. Finally, experiments where a selection technique is followed by a transformation technique show that the combination can help substantially reduce the computational cost associated with the best transformation methods (ICA and LSI) while preserving clustering performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".