MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781672147 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2017/29334.10931

Role-playing versus Conventional Strategy in Midwifery Clinical Education on Breast Self-examination: A Quasi-Experimental Study

2017· article· en· W2781672147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstetricsPsychologyMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Iranian women develop breast cancer 10 years earlier than those in developed countries. Breast SelfExamination (BSE) is a useful screening tool. The emphasis on counseling and training is given to promote breast health in the society by midwives. There is a need to educate students with the necessary skills in this area. Aim: To compare the impact of role-playing versus conventional strategy on midwifery student’s skills, and subsequently on their clients' knowledge, skills, and health beliefs about BSE. Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in two parts. At first, 32 students were equally divided as the role-playing and conventional groups. After educational intervention, the skills of the students in BSE counseling and training were evaluated by a checklist. Then, through convenience sampling, 60 women were equally divided in the experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught by role-playing group of students and the control group was taught by conventional group of students. The women’s BSE health beliefs, skills, and knowledge were compared before and after education to demonstrate the impact of the students' skills. The women filled out the BSE health beliefs questionnaires. The BSE knowledge questionnaires and the BSE skills checklists were completed by the student through interview and observation respectively. The data were analysed on 5% error using software SPSS-version 16.0. Results: According to the results, the mean score of students' skills in the role-playing group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (p<0.001) in BSE education and counseling. The results also showed that the women trained by the role-playing group of students had dramatically higher scores (p<0.001) in health beliefs, skills and knowledge about BSE. Conclusion: Role-playing strategy can improve the midwifery student’s counseling and training skills. So, they could be effective in development of women’s knowledge, skills and health beliefs about BSE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.417
GPT teacher head0.600
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it