Reduced Protein C Global Assay Levels in Infertile Women with in vitro Fertilization Failure: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein C global is a global dotting assay that evaluates abnormalities in the protein C anticoagulant pathway. A few studies have examined this assay in relation to assisted reproductive technology (ART), but its role in infertile women with in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure remains unclear. In this study, we assessed protein C in infertile women with a history of IVF failure who were undergoing ART. We examined 45 healthy fertile women who conceived naturally, and 45 infertile women with 2 or more implantation failures undergoing ART. Both protein C and activated protein C resistance (APC-R) were evaluated. The results showed that mean protein C expressed as a normalized ratio (PCAT-NR) was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group (0.76 ± 0.15 vs. 0.91 ± 0.14, respectively; p = 0.0001). Follow-up on ART outcomes showed that women who failed ART had significantly lower PCAT-NR compared to successful cases. PCAT-NR did not correlate with APC-R levels in the study (r = 0.125, p < 0.5) or failed ART subgroups. Using logistic regression analysis, patients with lower PCAT-NR levels showed an elevated risk of implantation failure (p = 0.04, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.84). In conclusion, protein C global assay may play a role in the etiology of IVF failure, which might be independent of APC-R. Larger studies are encouraged to validate these findings and explore the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".