MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781836475 · doi:10.11575/prism/30871

An Assessment of Eucalyptus Version 1.4

2009· article· en· W2781836475 on OpenAlexaff
Cameron Kiddle, Tingxi Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceOperating systemProvisioningVirtual machineHypervisorUsabilityDatabaseVirtualizationWorld Wide WebSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud Computing is the emergent technology that promises on-demand, dynamic and easily accessible computing power. The “pay-as-you-use” scheme is attractive for small to medium sized businesses as these organizations are less inclined to purchase large amounts of physical machines to satisfy their immediate computing needs. Various cloud services are already available on the market. Many of them implement some form of dynamic provisioning of computing resources through the use of Virtual Machine (VM) tech- nologies like Xen [13], VMWare [28] or KVM [16]. Among them, the Amazon Elastic Cloud (EC2) [3] can be considered the most popular and mature solution. Eucalyptus [20], a cloud enabling infrastructure is the result of a research project from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Eucalyptus stands for “Elastic Utility Computing Architecture for Linking Your Programs To Useful Systems”. It aims to provide a simple to set up cloud solution for the research and development of cloud driven applications. By combining common web-service, Linux tools and the Xen Virtual Machine Hypervisor, Eucalyptus successfully implemented partial functionality of the popular Amazon EC2. As a consequence of recreating a “free” version of EC2, this open source project has attracted much attention and it is scheduled to be included into Ubuntu 9.10 (code name Karmic Koala) [15], the to-be-release version of a popular Linux distribution. This document records a recent effort to evaluate Eucalyptus as a viable open source solution to cloud computing. The evaluation focuses on the design, setup, usability and performance of Eucalyptus. In Section 2, we discuss the general design goals and infrastructure layout of Eucalyptus. Section 3 documents the process of setting up a Eucalyptus environment. Section 4 covers the usage and general impressions of Eucalyptus’s functionalities. In Section 5, we developed a demonstrator to illustrate the potential real-world usage of Eucalyptus v1.4. Finally in Section 7 and 8, we provide some related work and a conclusion to this document.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207