De l’imaginaire à la création de mondes possibles : espaces et immersion fictionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude a pour but de comprendre la relation qu’il peut exister entre la création de mondes imaginaires et les espaces mimétiques de l’immersion fictionnelle. Pour ce faire, dans quatre ouvrages destinés à l’enfance, à savoir Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland de Lewis Carroll, Le Avventure di Pinocchio de Carlo Collodi, Peter Pan de James Matthew Barrie et Le Petit Prince d’Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, nous analyserons trois espaces-types illustrant l’immersion fictionnelle, l’espace de lecture, l’espace onirique et l’espace de jeux enfantins, pour établir les étapes de la constitution d’un monde imaginaire et comprendre le passage transitoire d’une littérature à une autre.In this contribution, we talk about the relation between wonderlands and space of fictional immersion in four books of childhood literature: Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (Lewis Carroll), Le Avventure di Pinocchio (Carlo Collodi), Peter Pan by (James Matthew Barrie) and Le Petit Prince (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry). This study analyzes three spaces which illustrate fictional immersion : space of read, space of dream and space of childhood playing. These items will establish the process of the construction of imaginaries worlds and understand the transition between two literatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".