MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2781943524 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2017.2777099

Channel-Adaptive ADC and TDC for 28 Gb/s PAM-4 Digital Receiver

2018· article· en· W2781943524 on OpenAlexafffund
Fnu Aurangozeb, AKM Delwar Hossain, Maruf Mohammad, Masum Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceSuccessive approximation ADCFlash ADCComparatorLookup tableCMOSJitterChannel (broadcasting)Computer hardwareElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-power channel-adaptive 28 Gb/s PAM-4 receiver is presented utilizing a predictive analog-to-digital converter (ADC), a successive-approximation-register (SAR) time-to-digital converter (TDC), and a feed-forward equalizer (FFE) in the digital domain. The variable-resolution flash ADC takes advantage of the channel inter-symbol interference (ISI) and can achieve 5.5 bits resolution utilizing only 16 comparators. By reusing the comparators, the ADC can provide a programmable resolution from 2 to 5.5 bits consuming 40 to 90 mW, respectively. The SAR-TDC generates 5 bits timing information that includes 2 bits ISI and 3 bits timing error to achieve a low-latency and low-jitter timing recovery. Subsequently, a three-to-eight programmable tap FFE is used to equalize up to 30-dB loss achieving bit error rate lower than 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-8</sup> . FFE is implemented in a field-programmable gate array, and the first three taps are realized in a look-up table (LUT). An offline higher resolution ADC is used to generate the pre-computed values for the LUT. Measured power consumption is 130 mW (excluding digital signal processing) from a 1.2-V power supply with active chip area of 0.2025 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> in 65-nm technology. Due to programmability on the both ADC resolution and the number of FFE taps according to the channel loss, the receiver enables energy efficiency according to loss compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207