Geoelectric structure of the Great Slave Lake shear zone in northwest Alberta: implications for structure and tectonic history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of ancient plate boundaries can provide insights into the past and present-day tectonic processes. Here, we describe a magnetotellurics (MT) study of the Precambrian basement of the Hay River Fault (HRF) in northwest Alberta, which is the southwest segment of the Great Slave Lake shear zone. New broadband MT data were collected to give a clearer image of the crustal structure. The Western Canada Sedimentary Basin was imaged as a low-resistivity layer above the resistive crystalline basement. Four basement conductors were defined, and correlate with the terrane boundaries delineated with aeromagnetic data. These are (1) a major conductor in the Kiskatinaw domain, (2) a conductor on the boundary of the Ksituan and Chinchaga domains, (3) a conductor on the boundary of the Chinchaga and Buffalo Head domains, and (4) a conductor near the HRF. Both (1) and (2) correspond to areas of high seismic reflectivity. The low resistivity can be explained by interconnected grain boundary graphite or sulfide phases deposited by metamorphic fluid migration. The HRF was not definitively located in previous studies. The new data show that the HRF could be thin (1 km) or wide (10 km) and located at the boundary of the contrasting aeromagnetic anomalies or further to the north. Various tectonic processes are proposed to interpret the possible locations of the HRF. No electrical anisotropy structure is required to interpret the MT data in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".