MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782180976 · doi:10.2495/safe-v7-n3-361-366

Roles and scope of system interface in integrated control system for multi disaster countermeasure

2017· article· en· W2782180976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Institute of Construction TechnologyMinistry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
KeywordsScope (computer science)CountermeasureInterface (matter)Computer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)EngineeringBusinessOperating systemAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damages on human and physical properties have recently become significant due to natural disasters, such as earthquake and hurricanes, as well as social disasters, such as fire in subway and terrorist attacks using explosive. Notably, as buildings are becoming taller and more complex, demands on countermeasure to multi disasters, such as earthquake, fire, and flooding, are increasing for complex skyscraper facilities. Complex skyscraper facilities are equipped with constant management systems, such as facility management, lighting management, CCTV management, and parking management, as well as event-based emergency management system, such as fire control, flooding control, seismic detection, and wind detection. While part of the information for each system is currently being collected by a central monitoring system in the form of SI (system integration), it is difficult to perform SOP (standard operating procedure)-based integrated control because data protocols for sensors and receivers are different. An integrated system for efficient countermeasure/evacuation in complex skyscraper facilities is currently under development, and this study organizes the roles and scope of system interface for linkage of information among the integrated system, disaster information collection system, analysis system, and countermeasure system. The scope of disaster at this point was limited to earthquake, flooding, and fire. The system interface that is designed by this study is one of core modules for implementing an integrated system, and is to be used to present future directions for development of integrated CPS (Cyber Physical System) in countermeasure to disasters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it