Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring the vast expanse of oceans presents a daunting challenge: how to take sufficient high-quality measurements with a relatively small group of specialized scientists and limited resources. Despite advances in remote sensing and autonomous technology, the oceans remain under-explored and under-sampled. One solution for addressing this challenge is to rely on citizen scientists, people outside of the scientific community, to collect oceanographic data. This paper describes how through three unique successful citizen science programs, oceanographers have increased temporal and spatial coverage of high-quality CTD profiles using a Wi-Fi enabled CTD and an easy to use mobile device app. The three programs include the Shelf Research Fleet: a group of fishermen partnered with Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, the Pacific Salmon Foundation: a partnership between the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Ocean Networks Canada, and the Coastal Community Ocean Observers program: a network of citizen scientists distributed along remote Alaskan coasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it