MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782275502 · doi:10.1055/s-0036-1591868

Mechanochemical Organic Synthesis: The Art of Making Chemistry Green

2018· article· en· W2782275502 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vjekoslav Štrukil

Bibliographic record

VenueSynlett · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMechanosynthesisMechanochemistryChemistryOrganic synthesisNanotechnologyBiochemical engineeringGreen chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisReaction mechanismChemical engineeringEngineeringBall mill

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite growing interest in mechanochemistry, its application in the organic-synthesis laboratory has still not reached the level of being commonplace. Inspired by this apparent underrepresentation of mechanochemical practice in the broad organic-chemistry community, this article aims to highlight some of the most interesting aspects of modern mechanosynthesis, with particular emphasis on the potential of mechanochemistry to allow reaction discovery and the development of novel synthetic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynlettSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207