MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2782687187 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v17i2.423

Fabrication of Carbon Graphite-supported Pt–SiW12O40 Catalysts Effect of the Pt Loading on the Electrooxidation of Cyclohexane

2014· article· en· W2782687187 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Saleh, Ahmed Aouissi, A. A. Al‐Suhybani, Abdullah M. Al‐Mayouf

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclohexanoneCyclohexaneCyclohexanolGraphiteCatalysisGlassy carbonCyclic voltammetryMaterials scienceCarbon fibersInorganic chemistryPlatinumNuclear chemistryChemistryElectrodeElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

H4SiW12O40 (abbreviated as SiW) and Pt supported on carbon graphite (CG) with different Pt/SiW ratios were prepared and characterized by FTIR, XRD, ICP-OES, polarography, and TEM. The prepared catalysts were then after successfully attached onto glassy carbon electrodes by using polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) as binder. The resulting electrocatalysts were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and tested for the electrooxidation of cyclohexane. It has been found that the addition of SiW to the catalyst increased the dispersion of the Pt particles. The results of the electrocatalytic tests showed that cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, and cyclohexyl hydroperoxide are formed as major products of the reaction. Higher Pt loadings promoted cyclohexanone production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207