Fabrication of Carbon Graphite-supported Pt–SiW12O40 Catalysts Effect of the Pt Loading on the Electrooxidation of Cyclohexane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
H4SiW12O40 (abbreviated as SiW) and Pt supported on carbon graphite (CG) with different Pt/SiW ratios were prepared and characterized by FTIR, XRD, ICP-OES, polarography, and TEM. The prepared catalysts were then after successfully attached onto glassy carbon electrodes by using polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) as binder. The resulting electrocatalysts were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and tested for the electrooxidation of cyclohexane. It has been found that the addition of SiW to the catalyst increased the dispersion of the Pt particles. The results of the electrocatalytic tests showed that cyclohexanone, cyclohexanol, and cyclohexyl hydroperoxide are formed as major products of the reaction. Higher Pt loadings promoted cyclohexanone production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".