Role of Nucleophosmin Gene Mutation in Leukemogenesis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: AML through studying its contribution in proliferation of AML cell line cells. METHODS: Two types of human leukemia cell lines were used. One of them was a model for AMLs with mNPM and the other for AMLs with wild type (wt) NPM. Assessment of the proliferative role of mNPM in AML was carried out using cell culture and viability studies. The obtained results were reaffirmed by immunocytochemical and immunoblotting techniques. RESULTS: Analysis of results was done with the appropriate computer software. It showed higher proliferative potential of cells with mNPM compared to those bearing wtNPM only. Furthermore, the immunocytochemical studies demonstrated subcellular localization of NPM isoforms during various phases of mitosis. Mitosis was associated with cytoplasmic translocation of wtNPM in certain phases, while localization of mNPM remained unchanged throughout the cell cycle. Results of immunoblotting showed little or no change in protein expression of either NPM moieties during mitosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated important contribution of NPM gene mutation in enhancing proliferation of AML cell lines. These results confirmed the role of mNPM in AML leukemogenesis, and highlighted the importance of targeting mNPM in new evolving AML therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".