MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783162669 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2792300

Optimization Algorithms for Multiaccess Green Communications in Internet of Things

2018· article· en· W2783162669 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangping Zhai, Xiaoxiao Guan, Chunsheng Zhu, Lei Shu, Jiabin Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer sciencePower domainsUpper and lower boundsWirelessMathematical optimizationApproximation algorithmOptimization problemConvex optimizationConvex functionTransmitter power outputRelaxation (psychology)Power (physics)AlgorithmMathematicsRegular polygonTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential increase of the intelligent connected devices and the dramatic growth of the wireless data traffic have motivated the development of the green wireless networks as well as the Internet of Things (IoT). In this paper, we study the minimization problem of the total power to satisfy the required rate constraints in IoT, where the users simultaneously communicate through multiple independent channels. This problem is complicated due to the nonlinear data rate function based on the Shannon capacity formula. To this end, we first transfer the initial problem in power domain to an equivalent problem in rate domain instead of direct approximation for the high data rate. Then, we approximate it to a convex problem with the spectral radius constraints by the use of the Neumann expansion and nonlinear Perron-Frobenius theorem. By doing so, we achieve the close upper bound for this total power minimization problem. Moreover, we obtain the lower bound by making use of the convex relaxation technique, and finally get the global optimal solution by leveraging the branch-and-bound method. Simulation results verify that our proposed algorithms have a good approximation to the global optimal value for the power and rate allocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207