MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783214188 · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b01085

Genetically Encoded Glutamate Indicators with Altered Color and Topology

2018· article· en· W2783214188 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiahui Wu, Ahmed S. Abdelfattah, Hang Zhou, Araya Ruangkittisakul, Yong Qian, Klaus Ballanyi, Robert E. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Chemical Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGovernment of CanadaUniversity Hospital FoundationInstitute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and AddictionUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsGlutamate receptorHippocampal formationNeuroscienceFluorescenceHEK 293 cellsAmino acidBiologyMetabotropic glutamate receptor 6ChemistryBiophysicsCell biologyBiochemistryMetabotropic glutamate receptorGenePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glutamate is one of the 20 common amino acids and of utmost importance for chemically mediated synaptic transmission in nervous systems. To expand the color palette of genetically encoded indicators for glutamate, we used protein engineering to develop a red intensity-based glutamate-sensing fluorescent reporter (R-iGluSnFR1). Manipulating the topology of R-iGluSnFR1, and a previously reported green fluorescent indicator, led to the development of noncircularly permutated (ncp) variants. R- and R ncp -iGluSnFR1 display glutamate affinities of 11 μM and 0.9 μM, respectively. We demonstrate that these glutamate indicators are functional when targeted to the surface of HEK-293 cells. Furthermore, we show that G ncp -iGluSnFR enabled reliable visualization of extrasynaptic glutamate in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, while R-iGluSnFR can reliably resolve action potential-evoked glutamate transients by electrical field stimuli in cultures of dissociated hippocampal neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Chemical BiologySame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207