MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783352565 · doi:10.1080/1061186x.2017.1419361

Current update of a thermosensitive liposomes composed of DPPC and Brij78

2018· review· en· W2783352565 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Ho, Mehrdad Bokharaei, Shyh‐Dar Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of drug targeting · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiposomeBiodistributionPharmacokineticsDrug deliveryPharmacologyBlood circulationChemistryMicrobubblesMedicineNanotechnologyMaterials scienceIn vitroBiochemistryTraditional medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermosensitive liposomes (TSLs) have been a prominent area of study in the discipline of tumour-targeted chemotherapeutics. The representative product of TSLs is ThermoDox® (DPPC/lyso-PC/PEG-lipid), which has advanced to Phase III clinical trials. Various groups have sought to develop a new TSL to improve upon the LTSL (lyso-lipid temperature-sensitive liposomes) formulation that is used to prepare ThermoDOX®. This review focuses on the development and recent update of an innovative TSL formulation, HaT-liposomes composed of DPPC and Brij78. Various parameters of LTSL and HaT-liposomes are compared, including size, loading efficiency, transition temperature, temperature-dependent release kinetics, stability, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and antitumour activity. Theranostic techniques involving HaT-liposomes are reported with regard to magnetic resonance imaging of drug delivery to tumours and identification of an early therapeutic biomarker in the treated tumour. The development of a further improved TSL formulation upon HaT-liposomes with improved stability and prolonged blood circulation is reported. Delivery of membrane impermeable drugs using HaT-liposomes is explored. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of this technology are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of drug targetingSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207