The complexity of simulating local measurements on quantum systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important task in quantum physics is the estimation of local quantities for ground states of local Hamiltonians. Recently, [Ambainis, CCC 2014] defined the complexity class<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>, and motivated its study by showing that the physical task of estimating the expectation value of a local observable against the ground state of a local Hamiltonian is<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-complete. In this paper, we continue the study of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>, obtaining the following lower and upper bounds.Lower bounds (hardness results): - The<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-completeness result of [Ambainis, CCC 2014] requires<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>-local observables and Hamiltonians. We show that simulating even a<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mtext class="MJX-tex-mathit" mathvariant="italic">single qubit</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>measurement on ground states of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:math>-local Hamiltonians is<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-complete, resolving an open question of Ambainis.- We formalize the complexity theoretic study of estimating two-point correlation functions against ground states, and show that this task is similarly<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-complete. - We identify a flaw in [Ambainis, CCC 2014] regarding a<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-hardness proof for estimating spectral gaps of local Hamiltonians. By introducing a ``query validation'' technique, we build on [Ambainis, CCC 2014] to obtain<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>-hardness for estimating spectral gaps under polynomial-time Turing reductions. Upper bounds (containment in complexity classes): -<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>is thought of as ``slightly harder'' than QMA. We justify this formally by exploiting the hierarchical voting technique of [Beigel, Hemachandra, Wechsung, SCT 1989] to show<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>. This improves the containment<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>[Kitaev, Watrous, STOC 2000]. This work contributes a rigorous treatment of the subtlety involved in studying oracle classes in which the oracle solves a<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math>problem. This is particularly relevant for quantum complexity theory, where most natural classes such as BQP and QMA are defined as promise classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".