Role of Presulfidation and H<sub>2</sub>S Cofeeding on Carbon Formation on SS304 Alloy during the Ethane–Steam Cracking Process at 700 °C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of presulfidation and H 2 S cofeeding on the carbon formation on SS304 alloy in the ethane–steam cracker was investigated in a laboratory-scale quartz reactor setup. SS304H coupons and SS304L powder samples were exposed to ethane–steam and dry ethane in varying H 2 S content (0–50 ppm), and the SS304 samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. This study shows that H 2 S cofeeding decreases catalytic carbon formation; while it increases the pyrolytic carbon formation during ethane–steam cracking. Preoxidation, presulfidation, and addition of steam to ethane feed also reduces the amount of catalytic carbon formed on the SS304H surface in short-term experiments (4 h). Presulfidation and addition of H 2 S to ethane feed significantly influences the shape and size of the carbon formed on the surfaces of investigated metal alloys. Presulfidation and H 2 S cofeeding reduced spalling of the SS304H coupon surface during coking/decoking and thermal cycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".