High-resolution two-photon spectroscopy of a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> transition of xenon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report high-resolution Doppler-free two-photon excitation spectroscopy of Xe from the ground state to the $5{p}^{5}(^{2}P_{3/2})6p\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}^{2}[3/2]_{2}$ electronic excited state. This is a first step to developing a comagnetometer using polarized $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ atoms for planned neutron electric dipole moment measurements at TRIUMF. Narrow linewidth radiation at 252.5 nm produced by a continuous wave laser was built up in an optical cavity to excite the two-photon transition, and the near-infrared emission from the $5{p}^{5}6p$ excited state to the $5{p}^{5}6s$ intermediate electronic state was used to detect the two-photon transition. Hyperfine constants and isotope shift parameters were evaluated and compared with previously reported values. In addition, the detected photon count rate was estimated from the observed intensities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.208 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".