Effect of synthetic condition on the electrochemical behavior of MoO<sub>3</sub> microplates used as anode in lithium-ion batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) microplates are synthesized via the hydrothermal method and a simple heat treatment process without adding surfactant. Different hydrothermal reaction times and acidities are employed to explore the influence of preparation condition on the electrochemical performance for MoO3 microplates. These studies reveal that the hydrothermal time and acidity have a great impact on the morphology of MoO3 microplates. As anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the sheets-assembled MoO3 microplates with longer hydrothermal reaction time and proper acidity possess a superior morphology, which show better cycling performance and rate capability stability. The prepared MoO3 microplates display that the coulombic efficiency is around 100% during 50 cycles, demonstrating much better lithium storage properties. Considering the excellent electrochemical performance, the MoO3 microplates are considered to be a potential candidate in high-performance LIBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".