Enhancing interfacial and mechanical strength of styrene‐butadiene rubber composites via <i>in situ</i> fabricated halloysite nanotubes/silica nano hybrid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In situ fabricated nano hybrid halloysite nanotubes (HNTs‐g‐Silica) by chemically grafting silica nanoparticles onto HNTs was used as the reinforcing filler for styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). The dispersion of HNTs‐g‐Silica and the interfacial interaction between HNTs‐g‐Silica and SBR were systematically investigated. The results suggested that HNTs‐g‐Silica was uniformly dispersed in SBR matrix. Moreover, compared with HNTs or the mixture of mixed HNTs/silica, HNTs‐g‐Silica could immobilize more rubber chains on its surface, manifesting a strong interfacial interaction between HNTs‐g‐Silica and SBR. Consequently, SBR/HNTs‐g‐Silica composites showed much higher mechanical strength and extensibility than SBR/HNTs/Silica or SBR/HNTs composites, for example, showing 123% increase in tensile strength compared with SBR/HNTs composites when the filler content was 30 phr. Besides, the loss factor at 60°C of SBR/HNTs‐g‐Silica composites was significantly lower than that of SBR/HNTs composites, indicating that HNTs‐g‐Silica should be better energy saving than HNTs when used in rubber tire materials. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:677–684, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".