MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2783911484 · doi:10.1080/24745332.2018.1465368

Pneumothorax in chronically ventilated neuromuscular and chest wall restricted patients: A case series

2018· article· en· W2783911484 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Loewen, Raymond Tye, Karen P. Rimmer, Kristin Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSouth Health CampusAlberta HealthUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumothoraxPleurodesisMechanical ventilationBody mass indexSurgeryAirwayAnesthesiaAirway managementInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Pneumothorax can occur in chronically ventilated neuromuscular and chest wall-restricted patients using noninvasive home mechanical ventilation (HMV) and airway clearance techniques. Limited descriptions of these cases and their management exist in the literature.OBJECTIVES: To understand the unique considerations in diagnosis and management of pneumothorax in the neuromuscular and chest wall-restricted patient population.METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at the Peter Lougheed Neuromuscular Respiratory Clinic between 2006 and 2017. A case series of six patients is presented.RESULTS: Median duration of HMV at time of the pneumothorax was 3 years (range 0.25-9 years). Five patients used airway clearance techniques. The mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 1.0 L (27% predicted). Patients had a low mean body mass index (BMI) of 16 ± 3 kg/m2. Five of 6 patients required chest tube and had prolonged air leak (>48 hours). Four of 6 had recurrent pneumothoraces. One patient received chemical pleurodesis.CONCLUSIONS: Clinical suspicion and rapid diagnosis are necessary for pneumothorax in neuromuscular and chest wall-restricted patients dependent on HMV. CT imaging of the chest may be necessary. Management can include: reducing ventilator pressure settings, suspending airway clearance techniques and chest tube insertion. Chemical or surgical pleurodesis are felt to be high risk; however, recurrent pneumothorax was frequent in this cohort. Low BMI raises the possible association between malnutrition and risk of pneumothorax in patients receiving HMV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Respiratory Critical Care and Sleep MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207