Calidad de la atención médica en consultorio selecionado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: the varieties of quality control have been transformed over time by Vuori and Donabedian, who have made great contributions to the varieties of quality control, the latter, considered the founder of the study of the quality of care health, defined as: activities aimed at ensuring accessible and equitable services, with optimal professional benefits, bearing in mind the available resources, achieving adherence and user satisfaction with the care received. Objective: to evaluate the quality of medical care at Pedro Borras University Polyclinic in Pinar del Rio, in the last quarter of 2016. Method: a descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study was carried out, through the methodological proposal to evaluate the quality in the Primary Health Care, including Process and Results data. The target group consisted of one thousand 294 patients belonging to a randomly chosen clinic, a sample of convenience was taken including the 152 patients older than 15 years old assigned to perform the analysis of the health situation. Results: the age group that predominated was 65 years and older, the main cause of consultation was upper respiratory infections, the medical care provided was considered of quality, the highest number of the predetermined standards exceeded the established percentage, both in medical performance and in user satisfaction. Conclusions: it was found that the quality of the medical care provided in the chosen clinic was considered satisfactory by both researchers and users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".