Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ingalits sociales, production des savoirs et de l'ignorance 1 P rivilge et autorit pistmiques, appropriation des savoirs, injustices pis- tmiques, cognitives ou encore testimoniales, mise sous silence, ignorance produite, pistmicide, pratiques pistmiques de rsistance, savoirs dcoloniaux Voici quelques-uns des concepts mobiliss par les pistmologies fministes et postcoloniales contemporaines pour repenser les liens entre ingalits sociales et production des savoirs. Ces concepts peuvent tre regroups sous le chapeau de la recherche sur les ingalits pistmiques, que l'on peut dfinir provisoirement comme un type particulier d'ingalit qui se manifeste dans l'accs, la reconnaissance et la production des savoirs et des diffrentes formes d'ignorance. Ces ingalits pistmiques sont le produit d'ingalits systmiques et de situations d'oppression qui structurent les rapports sociaux autant qu'elles contribuent les alimenter, mme si les auteur.e.s auxquel.le.s nous nous rfrons conceptualisent diffremment les liens entre la hirarchie des positions sociales des membres des diffrents groupes sociaux et les ingalits pistmiques qu'elles gnrent ou renforcent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.718 | 0.464 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".