Castellion à Vandoeuvres (1515–2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume contains four conference papers that were delivered at the Jubilee marking the five-hundredth anniversary of Castellion's birth that was held in Vandoeuvres, France.These papers analyze different aspects of this religious thinker, and aim to show how Castellion's thought is relevant to the present time.The four authors-Marie-Christine Gomez-Géraud, Max Engammare, Michel Grandjean, and Philippe Fromont-are all specialists on Castellion; their book seems intended for any student of this prolific sixteenth-century theologian.It is complemented by an index of the names used in the volume and of the works of Castellion.The introduction, written by Pastor Vincent Schmid, talks about the Jubilee as a way of rectifying the fact that virtually no celebration of Sebastien Castellion had ever before taken place.Schmid then traces the relationship between John Calvin and Castellion until the controversy surrounding Michel Servet's death.He continues by talking about the subject's spirit of tolerance and peace, and finishes by underlining the significance of Castellion's thought for the times in which we live.Castellion, in other words, deserves to be heard in an age marked by religious absolutism.Schmid's comments on the articles are interspersed between paragraphs in his survey of Castellion's life.The first article, by Gomez-Géraud, focuses on Castellion's translation of the Bible into everyday French: La Bible nouvellement translatée.She starts by discussing Castellion's humanism and his translations in this vein.In her study of Castellion's biblical translations, she begins with the Moses latinus: Castellion's Latin translation of the Pentateuch.She shows here that his translation was more philological than spiritual.Next, she discusses La Bible nouvellement translatée.Here, she analyzes three of Castellion's characteristics as its translator: teacher, writer, and believer.She establishes one way in which Castellion made difficult words understood in this Bible: neologisms.She also notes that Castellion's translation brought the text alive through its vivaciousness.She finishes by touching on the fact that Castellion was not an ivory tower intellectual: he was involved in the world.His translation of the Bible into everyday French is proof of this.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".