MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784058833 · doi:10.1109/icdim.2017.8244644

Compliance evaluation of information privacy protection in e-government systems in Anglophone West Africa using ISO/IEC 29100:2011

2017· article· en· W2784058833 on OpenAlexaff
Amarachi Chinwendu Nwaeze, Pavol Zavarsky, Ron Ruhl

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Information privacy lawSierra leonePrivacy policyInformation privacyData Protection Act 1998BusinessPersonally identifiable informationInternet privacyComputer securityPrivacy by DesignPublic administrationPolitical scienceComputer scienceSociologySocioeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to various reasons, only few researchers focused their investigations on the current status of information security and privacy protection of e-Government services in Africa. This paper attempts to partially fill the gap by reporting on the compliance evaluation of privacy protection in e-Government systems in the countries of Anglophone West Africa, namely in Ghana, Nigeria, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Gambia. In the countries, e-Government services have become one of the most important and efficient means by which government interacts with citizens. The ways to facilitate information privacy protection in e-Government systems of a given country include enactment of a comprehensive information privacy regulation. The regulation serves as a legal framework that considers internationally accepted privacy protection principles, such as those of the ISO/IEC 29100:2011, and applicable guidelines of the U.S. NIST SP 800-53 Rev.4. In this paper, the privacy principles of the ISO/IEC 29100:2011 serve as a baseline for evaluation of the content of privacy protection regulations of the Anglophone West African countries. The paper also reports results of a passive security reconnaissance performed on selected e-Government websites. While the paper acknowledges recent progresses made in the area of privacy protection in the countries of Anglophone West Africa, recommendations are provided to mitigate the identified gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207