Pilot production of steel slag masonry blocks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masonry blocks are usually made of Portland cement and cured by steam. This study explores the possibility of making masonry blocks using steel slag as binder and carbon dioxide as curing activator. By carbonation activation of steel slag blocks, carbon dioxide can be permanently sequestered in steel slag as calcium carbonates, leading to stronger and more durable construction blocks. In this paper, carbonated steel slag paste was first evaluated by thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, X-ray diffraction, carbon uptake, strength development, and leaching tests. Based on the preliminary results, the full-size masonry blocks were fabricated using steel slag as the binder and granite as the aggregates. The physical properties and durability of full-size steel slag masonry blocks were then examined through their density, water absorption, moisture content, compressive strength, and fire resistance. An economic analysis was performed and a carbon dioxide utilization capacity was estimated. This study demonstrates that production of steel slag masonry blocks by carbonation is an economically feasible way to utilize carbon dioxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".