MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784258094 · doi:10.1002/cncr.31234

Long‐term outcome of dasatinib first‐line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A multicenter, 2‐stage phase 2 trial (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research 56/07)

2018· article· en· W2784258094 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Montemurro, Angela Cioffi, Julien Dômont, Piotr Rutkowski, Arnaud Roth, Roger von Moos, Roman Inauen, Maud Toulmonde, Roger Burkhard, Claudio Knuesli, Sebastian Bauer, Philippe A. Cassier, Heike Schwarb, Axel Le Cesne, Dieter Koeberle, Daniela Bärtschi, Daniel Dietrich, Christine Biaggi, John O. Prior, Serge Leyvraz

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische KrebsforschungBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineDasatinibGiSTClinical endpointImatinib mesylateInternal medicineClinical trialImatinibPositron emission tomographyProgressive diseaseTyrosine-kinase inhibitorPhases of clinical researchCancerSurgeryGastroenterologyChemotherapyNuclear medicineStromal cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but most patients eventually develop resistance and progress. Dasatinib is a potent inhibitor of BCR‐ABL, KIT, and SRC family kinases as well as imatinib‐resistant cells. In GISTs, response evaluation is routinely done using computed tomography (CT) and 18 F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography coupled to CT (FDG‐PET/CT) for early response assessment and outcome prediction. METHODS This was a 2‐stage, phase 2 trial investigating dasatinib 2 × 70 mg per day in patients with histologically proven, TKI‐naïve, FDG‐PET/CT‐positive GIST. The primary endpoint was FDG‐PET/CT response. RESULTS Of 52 planned patients, 47 were enrolled from January 2008 to November 2011, when the trial was terminated because of slow accrual. In total, 42 patients were eligible. The median patient age was 61 years, 24 patients were men, and 18 were women. Performance status was 0 in 29 patients and 1 in 13 patients. The median follow‐up was 67.2 months. Patients went off trial for elective surgery (n = 8), after 26 cycles as per protocol (n = 5), for disease progression (n = 14), for toxicity (n = 7), and for other reasons (n = 5); and 3 patients died (2 had discontinued drug and 1 was still receiving drug). Toxicity was grade 4 in 5% and grade 3 in 48% of patients and was most often gastrointestinal or pulmonary. Dose was interrupted or reduced in 25% of cycles. The FDG‐PET/CT response rate (complete plus partial responses) at 4 weeks was 74% (95% confidence interval, 56%‐85%; 14 patients had a complete response, 17 had a partial response, 6 had stable disease, 3 had progressive disease, and 2 were not evaluable). The median progression‐free survival was 13.6 months, and the median overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS Dasatinib produced high metabolic response rates in TKI‐naive patients with FDG‐PET/CT‐positive GIST. Cancer 2018;124:1449‐54 . © 2018 American Cancer Society .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.340
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207