MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase 1 dose escalation study of the folate receptor-targeted small molecule drug conjugate EC1456.

2017· article· en· W2784273036 on OpenAlexaff
Wael A. Harb, Martin J. Edelman, Setsuko K. Chambers, Linda L. Garland, Alison Armour, Ding Wang, Glenwood Goss, Jasgit C. Sachdev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacokineticsAdverse effectFolate receptorPharmacologyToxicityTherapeutic indexConjugatePhases of clinical researchDrugInternal medicineOncologyCancerCancer cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2576 Background: The folate receptor (FR) is highly expressed in a variety of cancers including adenocarcinoma of the lung, but is expressed at low levels in most normal tissues, making it a potential target for therapeutic intervention. EC1456 is an FR-targeted small molecule drug conjugate (SMDC) consisting of folic acid chemically attached through a bio-releasable linker system to a potent microtubule inhibitor, tubulysin B hydrazide (TubBH). EC1456 binds to, and is endocytosed by the FR-expressing cancer cell to deliver TubBH. Following endocytosis, the FR recycles back to the membrane surface every 18-24 hours. Therefore alternative EC1456 schedules will be evaluated for safety, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic benefit. Methods: Part A (dose escalation) is being evaluated in unselected patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. 4 schedules (3-week cycle) are being evaluated: BIW (twice weekly); QW (once weekly); CWD (continuously weekly); QIW (four times a week). The primary objective of Part A is to determine the RP2 dose and schedule of EC1456. Part B (expansion) will confirm the MTD and RP2 dose and evaluate efficacy of EC1456 in 99mTc-etarfolatide-selected NSCLC patients in up to three schedules. Results: 74 Part A pts are evaluable for toxicity. Median age is 68 (range: 26-88); 53 pts are female. Toxicities are primarily Grade (Gr) 1 and 2. Common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) are gastrointestinal, fatigue, metabolic changes, alopecia, and headache. 5 Gr 3 DLTs have been observed: infusion reaction (4.5 mg/m2 QW), headache (10.0 mg/m2 QW), and abdominal pain (7.5 mg/m2 BIW, 12.5 mg/m2 QW and 10.0 mg/m2CWD). TRAEs are summarized in the table for each schedule. Durable stable disease of 12 wks or longer has been observed in 12 pts (6 BIW and 6 QW). Conclusions: All Part A EC1456 schedules have been well tolerated. RP2 dose for BIW is 6.0 mg/m2 and QW is 12.5 mg/m2; dose escalation is ongoing for CWD and QIW. Early signs of efficacy in an unselected pt population may be suggested by durable stable disease. Safety and efficacy evaluation in the 99mTc-etarfolatide-selected NSCLC population (Part B) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01999738. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.518
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207