MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784303276 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v17i2.430

Synthesis and Performance of Sulfated Zirconia Catalyst in Esterification of Oleic Acid

2014· article· en· W2784303276 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Berrones, K. Camas, Yolanda del Carmen Pérez, Eliana Ramírez, Ángel Pérez, D. Eapen, P.J. Sebastián

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOleic acidCatalysisCubic zirconiaCalcinationSulfuric acidChemistryFatty acid methyl esterMethanolNuclear chemistryBiodieselOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the performance of sulfated zirconia catalyst used in the synthesis of biodiesel by esterification of oleic acid was studied. For catalyst preparation the zirconium dioxide (ZrO) by Aldrich was used as precursor. The sulfated zirconia obtained was calcined for 3 hours at different temperatures (200, 400, 600 and 700 °C) in an oxygen atmosphere. Each of the calcination conditions generated a sample of catalyst, which was used in the esterification reaction. The esterification reaction was carried out using reagents such as oleic acid and methanol at a molar ratio 1:20. The sulfated zirconia catalyst was used in the reaction in various proportions by weightrelative to the weight of oleic acid (0.5, 1.0, 3.0 and 5%). The analysis of methyl ester conversion was performed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (CGMS) and the percentage area of the characteristic peaks as methyl oleate was quantified. A characterization of sulfated zirconia was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Finally, the catalyst performance was studied in the reduction of the acid index (AI) and the conversion of free fatty acids of oleic acid and compared to other commonly used catalyst for this purpose, which is concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207