MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784380258 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09562

Ultraviolet Upconversion Luminescence in a Highly Transparent Triply-Doped Gd<sup>3+</sup>–Tm<sup>3+</sup>–Yb<sup>3+</sup> Fluoride–Phosphate Glasses

2018· article· en· W2784380258 on OpenAlexafffund
Gustavo Galleani, Silvia H. Santagneli, Yannick Ledemi, Younès Messaddeq, Oliver Janka, Rainer Pöttgen, Hellmut Eckert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsGenia Photonics (Canada)Université Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsFluoridePhoton upconversionScandiumUltravioletPhosphateLuminescenceIonPhosphate glassAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemistryInorganic chemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report near-infrared to ultraviolet (UV) upconversion emissions in triply-doped Gd 3+ –Tm 3+ –Yb 3+ fluoride–phosphate glasses. Emission at 310 nm, originated from the Gd 3+: 6 P 7/2 → 8 S 7/2 transition, was observed for the first time in glasses. The high-purity glasses prepared exhibit extended transparency in the UV down to 200–250 nm. The mixed fluoride–phosphate environment of the rare-earth ions was characterized by means of NMR techniques using scandium as a diamagnetic mimic for the luminescent species, for which the ligand distribution was quantified by 45 Sc{ 31 P} rotational echo double-resonance NMR. Both the intensity of the Gd 3+ emission as well as those of the UV emissions at 290, 347, and 363 nm increase with increasing ratio of fluoride to phosphate ligands coordinating to the rare-earth ion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207