MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2784381525 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/43/2493

Immobilization of the Alcohol Dehydrogenase Enzyme on TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanotubes for Application in Microfluidic Fuel Cell

2018· article· en· W2784381525 on OpenAlexaff
L.G. Arríaga, Jesús Adrián Díaz‐Real, J. Ledesma‐García, Juan de Dios Galindo de la Rosa, Alejandra Álvarez, Geraldine Gonzalez Solano

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthylene glycolMaterials scienceAlcohol dehydrogenaseElectrolyteVinyl alcoholChemical engineeringImmobilized enzymeCatalysisElectrochemistryMethanolElectrodeNanotechnologyChemistryEthanolOrganic chemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microfluidic fuel cells are a low-power demand fuel cells which work without the need of a physical membrane and have a wide range of potential applications. Biological catalysts such as immobilized enzymes can be used in electrodes to carry out the oxidation processes of different organic fuels using the immobilization technology of enzymes; they are carried out under moderate conditions of pH and temperature, and the specificity of the catalytic reactions. The alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme has been used for the development of bioanodes for the oxidation of different alcohols such as ethanol and methanol. In this work, the immobilization of this enzyme was carried out using nanotubes of titanium dioxide for the development of electrodes for an air-breathing microfluidic fuel cell. TiO2 nanotubes has excellent properties such as pH resistance, superior mechanical strength, good biocompatibility making it a great candidate for the process of immobilization of the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase. TiO2 nanotubes were fabricated by electrochemical anodic oxidation on Ti foils. The foils were pre-treated with sand-paper, thereafter immersed in ethanol, placed in ultrasonic bath, dried under N2 flow. An ethylene glycol-based solution with a concentration of 0.1M NH4F (96% purity, Alfa-Aesar) and 2% w/w deionized water was used as electrolyte. The anodization times used was 1 h with a voltage step of 60 V via a power source. Using this nanostructure, the enzymatic electrode was constructed using a catalityc ink with enzyme, tetrabutylammonium bromide and Nafion to carry out the immobilization process. We carried out the characterization of the electrode developed by means of different electrochemical and kinetic techniques, where it was demonstrated that the enzyme is present and active in the electrode, as well as its capacity to oxidize ethanol. Then the bioanode was evaluated in the microfluidic device also using an inorganic cathode of Pt / C, obtaining a good performance over an open circuit potential greater than 0.93V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→